[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Test failures associated with FFTW
From: |
Daniel J Sebald |
Subject: |
Test failures associated with FFTW |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Mar 2013 02:33:15 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 |
Rik (maybe),
I ran "make test" and had a failure for
processing
/usr/local/src/octave/octave-dialog/build2/libinterp/dldfcn/fftw.cc-tst
***** testif HAVE_FFTW
def_method = fftw ("planner");
unwind_protect
method = "estimate";
fftw ("planner", method);
assert (fftw ("planner"), method);
method = "measure";
fftw ("planner", method);
assert (fftw ("planner"), method);
method = "patient";
fftw ("planner", method);
assert (fftw ("planner"), method);
method = "exhaustive";
fftw ("planner", method);
assert (fftw ("planner"), method);
method = "hybrid";
fftw ("planner", method);
assert (fftw ("planner"), method);
unwind_protect_cleanup
fftw ("planner", def_method);
end_unwind_protect
!!!!! test failed
value on right hand side of assignment is undefined
My conclusion is that this test is not being properly excluded. I run
lines individually and immediately get:
octave:1> def_method = fftw ("planner");
warning: fftw: this copy of Octave was not configured to use the FFTW3
planner
error: value on right hand side of assignment is undefined
so perhaps somewhere in the "configure" process the HAVE_FFTW should be
defined as null or logical 0???
Doing a search for "HAVE_FFTW" in addition to some other places I find:
config.log:AMCOND_HAVE_FFTW_FALSE=''
config.log:AMCOND_HAVE_FFTW_TRUE='#'
config.status:S["AMCOND_HAVE_FFTW_FALSE"]=""
config.status:S["AMCOND_HAVE_FFTW_TRUE"]="#"
Is something being overlooked there?
Dan
- Test failures associated with FFTW,
Daniel J Sebald <=