[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: bootstrapping Forge packages
From: |
Carnë Draug |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: bootstrapping Forge packages |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:27:41 +0000 |
On 18 March 2013 12:38, Mike Miller <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Carnë Draug <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> On 28 February 2013 12:18, Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> I noticed that the package needs to be boostraped before it can be
>>>> distributed. This breaks the current version of releasePKG.
>>>> @Carnë: What would be the procedure with packages like this?
>>>
>>> The procedure to release package like this is that the package manager
>>> runs ./bootstrap first, and then create a tarball of the result. Also,
>>> remove the "autom4te.cache" directory that may have been generated.
>>> Whether to also remove the bootstrap and configure.ac/in files from
>>> the tarball, is up to the package manager (probably we should settle
>>> on something?).
>>>
>>> Carnë
>>
>> ok, I am modifying releasePKG to run bootstrap and remove the
>> "autom4te.cache" directory. The other files may help to debug user
>> problems
>
> Among the "main" packages there are 3 with a bootstrap script and 15
> with an autogen.sh script.
>
> Since releasePKG now automatically handles bootstrap should we be
> encouraging standardization on that name? Or should releasePKG support
> both?
Would be nice to have standardize this on Octave Forge and have all
packages use only bootstrap. Still, I think releasePKG should support
both so that devs of non-forge packages can use autogen.sh as well.
Carnë