Re: specfun package cleanup

[Juan Pablo Carbajal]

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Carnë Draug <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 29 April 2013 15:34, Mike Miller <address@hidden> wrote:
>> CC'ing octave-maintainers list.
>>
>> On task #12153, Carnë wrote:
>>> Nice. I have removed them from the specfun package.
>>
>> I was hesitant to remove things since this is still in the development
>> version. Specfun now has a few things removed that are moved into
>> Octave, should we make it depend on octave >= 3.8.0 to ensure upgrades
>> don't lose functionality? And to ensure we don't accidentally make a
>> release of specfun before the next Octave goes out?
>
> Yes, dependent on >= 3.8 should be done. I removed those functions now
> since specfun is unmaintained, and a new Octave is likely to be
> released before specfun.
>
> Carnë

good move.
Specfun is community maintained though. I been moving functions to
miscellaneous to it...though slowly, but the work is there...