Re: Wavelet Denoising toolbox.

[Salman Javaid]

Should it just be part of the signal processing package?

Well, yes of course. I was looking at it from Matlab's perspective.

It's also very important that you can affirm that you have not
consulted any code from The Mathworks while writing this package.

I can affirm to that. In particular, Matlab's 2011 version doesn't implement Bayesian Shrink, and NeighShrink that I plan to implement. SureShrink is implemented though in Matlab.

Best Regards,

Salman Javaid

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden> wrote:

On 28 May 2013 16:05, Salman Javaid <address@hidden> wrote:

> I will like to develop a Wavelet Denoising module for Octave. Is
> this something that Octave team will be interested in?

Sure.

Should it just be part of the signal processing package?

By the way, you should note that TMW claims trademarks on a bunch of
things that end with "toolbox":

    http://www.mathworks.com/company/aboutus/policies_statements/trademarks.html

It is for this reason that we generally avoid the word "toolbox" when
talking about Octave packages.

It's also very important that you can affirm that you have not
consulted any code from The Mathworks while writing this package.

- Jordi G. H.