octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Building on MinGW using MXE-built dependencies [WAS: Re: mxe-install


From: Philip Nienhuis
Subject: Re: Building on MinGW using MXE-built dependencies [WAS: Re: mxe-installer try 2]
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:45:57 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100701 SeaMonkey/2.0.6

John W. Eaton wrote:
On 06/11/2013 04:18 PM, Philip Nienhuis wrote:

On my list is finding out how to build using mxe-octave on Windows 7
64-bit,

I'm starting to try the same thing now, so maybe we can help each other
and make it work.

Yep.
Note that if Iam not mistaken we are about 7 hours separated in time. I followed this thread a bit passively the last weeks, anyway I saw that you are now very actively involved in getting building on MinGW to work; while my available time is maybe 1-2 hours each evening (but my laptop can work all night). Tonight I got maybe 10 minutes left.

 > as that runs on my fastest dev box (the build I referred to runs
on an older Core Duo desktop).
I consistently get configure messages that "gcc cannot build
executables", with the log mentioning that ld cannot find a.o.,
-ladvapi32. Now, advapi32.dll and friends are in the C:\Windows\system32
dir which *is* in the MinGW PATH as /c/windows/system32. I've
experimented with LDFLAGS and other tricks to no avail :-) Google didn't
turn up a solution yet.
I think this is a very MinGW-specific issue.

This is with the 64-bit mingw and tools?

No, I started with the 32-bit MinGW stuff (to make a 32-bit Octave).
But perhaps 64-bit is a better goal on a 64-bit machine anyway.

Why is it trying to link with
advapi32? If that is normal, then where is that dependency coming from?
Is it explicitly listed in some Makefiles?

AFAICS it is built-in somewhere deep in MinGW. There are some related threads on this in various MinGW lists. Maybe it is related to win32api files. Tomorrow I'll dig a bit further.

Philip


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]