Re: JIT interrupt handler naming

[John W. Eaton]

On 07/24/2013 09:49 PM, Max Brister wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:16 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
>     On 07/24/2013 05:19 PM, Max Brister wrote:
>
>         If we want to support disabling interrupts I do not think the
>         API should
>         be JIT specific. If we add a function to disable interrupts in the
>         interpreter, we should make JIT match that behavior.
>
>
>     What is meant by "interrupts" in this context?
>
>     jwe
>
>
>
> Anything that sets octave_interrupt_state.

I don't think we should be disabling interrupts by default.  Whether 
code is JIT compiled or not, users will expect that they can interrupt 
Octave.

jwe