[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Binary packages for 3.8
From: |
c. |
Subject: |
Re: Binary packages for 3.8 |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:09:45 +0200 |
On 10 Oct 2013, at 16:00, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
> Ok. I was able to do what you're working on. The ease/robustness of the
> approach was sensitive to the installed port variants. If you run into any
> esoteric weirdness, let me know.
>
> Ben
Yes, I remember you did that's why I'm trying this approach again ...
As you've been there already, is there any specific trick you remeber you had
to use to make things work?
My next step will be to create a portfile for Octave 3.7, maybe you also tried
thi already?
c.
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, (continued)
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2013/10/09
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, Michael Goffioul, 2013/10/09
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, c., 2013/10/09
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, Ben Abbott, 2013/10/09
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, c., 2013/10/09
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, Ben Abbott, 2013/10/10
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, c., 2013/10/10
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, Ben Abbott, 2013/10/10
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, c., 2013/10/10
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, Ben Abbott, 2013/10/10
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8,
c. <=
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, Ben Abbott, 2013/10/10
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, c., 2013/10/22
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, c., 2013/10/22
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, Ben Abbott, 2013/10/22
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, c., 2013/10/22
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, Ben Abbott, 2013/10/22
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, c., 2013/10/24
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, c., 2013/10/24
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, Ben Abbott, 2013/10/24
- Re: Binary packages for 3.8, c., 2013/10/25