[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [forge: IO] Is this correct?
From: |
Juan Pablo Carbajal |
Subject: |
Re: [forge: IO] Is this correct? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:31:31 +0100 |
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Philip Nienhuis
<address@hidden> wrote:
> One of the ways to work around this situation might be if e.g., "pkg -forge"
> could be instructed to select a specific package version (e.g.,
> user-specified; based on Octave version; etc) to match the Octave version at
> hand. (So that for example Octave-3.6.4 would pick io-1.2.5). Or, to (maybe
> automagically) match the version of some other dependency package. (Hmmm...
> I see dependency hell looming ....)
This is in the document that Carnë compiled long ago. We did a heavy
clean up on pkg and make it more extensible. I am not sure what happen
to all those changes, since I had to break off from the community for
the span of 4 months.
Also, I am not an user of io, I was just checking the installation of
all the packages to search for errors and I found this one, but since
I wasn't able to find it in savannah I asked the mailing list.
@Carnë: what is the current status of the pkg branch?
- [forge: IO] Is this correct?, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2013/12/17
- Re: [forge: IO] Is this correct?, Carnë Draug, 2013/12/17
- Re: [forge: IO] Is this correct?, Philip Nienhuis, 2013/12/18
- Re: [forge: IO] Is this correct?, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2013/12/18
- Re: [forge: IO] Is this correct?, Philip Nienhuis, 2013/12/18
- Re: [forge: IO] Is this correct?, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2013/12/18
- Re: [forge: IO] Is this correct?, Philip Nienhuis, 2013/12/18
- Re: [forge: IO] Is this correct?,
Juan Pablo Carbajal <=
- Re: [forge: IO] Is this correct?, c., 2013/12/19