|
From: | Richard Crozier |
Subject: | Re: undefined compound chaining behavior |
Date: | Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:23:39 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 |
On 13/06/2014 09:20, Hossein Sajjadi wrote:
No, I'm afraid Jordi's right, you are wrong. I think we'll all have to just agree to disagree with you on this one. RichardPlease see the slide, and feel free to bring a reasonable argument,If so I will adhere yours.
Arguments are essentially thus: 1. Octave does not necessarily follow exactly the operators of C++2. The Octave devs have decided on the current behaviour of Octave language which is determined by the design of the Octave interpreter, and is independent of the C++ compiler
QED -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |