|
From: | Rik |
Subject: | Visual comparison of plot files |
Date: | Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:51:54 -0700 |
> Result of visual comparison: > > * gnuplot axis_09, axis_10, axis_11, axis_12, axis_13 > No, [x,y]axislocation' 'zero' -> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?40588 > This is an Octave (and gnuplot) only extension. It's not a problem that Matlab doesn't implement this. > * gnuplot + fltk colorbar_23_1: xtick unreadable > > * matlab comet3_01_1, comet_01_1.png only the beginning of the > animation. Perhaps we need to add a delay? I wouldn't bother with this one. Matlab implements comet in a completely different way which means printing isn't really possible for them. > > * gnuplot + fltk compass_01_1: no proper scaling/zoom. > Perhaps we can use polar as drawing function for compass? compass is correct in 3.8.1. The dev version has changed the underlying polar plot command, and apparently a side effect is that compass isn't scaling properly anymore. This should be filed as a Regression bug report on Savannah. > > * gnuplot ezsurf_02_1: distorted despite "axis equal" > > * gnuplot + ftlk: fill_01_1, fill_02_1: > hidden edges keep visible in matlab, not with fltk or gnuplot Are they visible on screen? Matlab also uses gl2ps, I think, to print things and there are some differences between what is rendered on-screen and what is rendered in the png file. If I run demo ('fill', 1) in FLTK then the on-screen image shows the hidden edge. It is only the printed version that differs. > > * gnuplot fill_03_1: unusable > > * gnuplot + ftlk: hold_07_1: red rectangle hides Is this also true in the on-screen version, or is it only the printed one? --Rik |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |