octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Test failures associated with license.m


From: Rik
Subject: Re: Test failures associated with license.m
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 21:02:42 -0700

On 10/05/2014 02:52 AM, address@hidden wrote:
Subject:
Test failures associated with license.m
From:
Daniel J Sebald <address@hidden>
Date:
10/04/2014 11:41 AM
To:
Octave Maintainers <address@hidden>
List-Post:
<mailto:address@hidden>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Precedence:
list
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<address@hidden>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Message:
1

I'm seeing some test failures.  One with polygcd, which I think is a known random occurrence failure.  (Should we change it to "known failure"?)  Then there are five failures for the output of the license command:

processing /usr/local/src/octave/octave-complex_operators/octave/scripts/miscellaneous/license.m
***** assert ((license ("inuse", "octave")).feature, "octave")
!!!!! test failed
cellfun: C must be a cell array

etc.


Dan,

I checked in a change to license.m so that it uses 'pkg list' instead of 'pkg describe all' (http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/672674d5e8d9).  This fixes the failing tests and also greatly speeds up the function because 'pkg describe all' is very slow.

tic; test license; toc

was 8.4 seconds and is now 0.64 seconds or ~13X improvement.

--Rik


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]