[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mac OS Binary
From: |
Sebastian Schöps |
Subject: |
Re: Mac OS Binary |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:14:47 -0800 (PST) |
Alexander Hansen-2 wrote
> Fink displays the license that we apply for each package in our online
> package database, e.g.
>
> http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/szip
> <http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/szip>
>
> I’m surprised that the other systems don’t do the same thing.
I do not know why homebrew is not doing that and yes this is a pity but even
if we would know the licenses, the question remains which ones would cause
trouble? Anyone knows?
@Carlo: do you recall which packages you included in the old mac binary?
what about the windows binary?
If other package managers are better suited, is anyone willing to create a
mac binary based on fink or macports any time soon? If not, is anyone
willing to help checking the licenses?
Bye
Sebastian
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Mac-OS-Binary-tp4673386p4673415.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Mac OS Binary, Sebastian Schöps, 2015/11/09
- Re: Mac OS Binary, c., 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, Marius Schamschula, 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, c., 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, Marius Schamschula, 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, c., 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, Marius Schamschula, 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, c., 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, Alexander Hansen, 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary,
Sebastian Schöps <=
- Re: Mac OS Binary, Carlo De Falco, 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, Eugenio Gianniti, 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, Eugenio Gianniti, 2015/11/10
Re: Mac OS Binary, Daniel J Sebald, 2015/11/10
Re: Mac OS Binary, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2015/11/12