Re: mxe-octave failed to compile optim

[Doug Stewart]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Olaf Till <address@hidden> wrote:

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:58:12PM -0400, JohnD wrote:
>
> Can you provide somewhere the full log/of-optim ?

Doug has given more info in an earlier post in a branch of this
thread, you probably overlooked it:

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:21:00AM -0400, Doug Stewart wrote:
> ...
> here is some more info
>
>       Trying pattern rule with stem 'error-helpers.cc'.
>        Trying implicit prerequisite 's.error-helpers.cc'.
>        Trying pattern rule with stem 'error-helpers.cc'.
>        Trying implicit prerequisite 'SCCS/s.error-helpers.cc'.
>        No implicit rule found for 'error-helpers.cc'.
>        Finished prerequisites of target file 'error-helpers.cc'.
>       No need to remake target 'error-helpers.cc'.
>       Pruning file 'error-helpers.h'.
>      Finished prerequisites of target file 'error-helpers.o'.
>     Must remake target 'error-helpers.o'.
> CXX=x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ -std=gnu++11 CXXFLAGS="-g -O2"
> /home/doug/octavec/mxe-octave-clone/usr/bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-mkoctfile
> --verbose -c error-helpers.cc
> Putting child 0x860c90 (error-helpers.o) PID 10306 on the chain.
> Live child 0x860c90 (error-helpers.o) PID 10306
> /bin/sh: 1: -std=gnu++11: not found

This mistake in the Makefile of optim and other packages has already
been pointed out by JohnD in another thread, I already said that I'll
fix that in these packages.

Olaf

Yes I remember that you said you would fix it. I thought it was fixed because others said that it worked out of the box, but I guess they had a patched version.  I will wait for the fix. I am not in a hurry --> just having fun.

 

--

DAS