Re: regarding GSoC 2016

[PhilipNienhuis]

Carnë Draug wrote
> On 24 March 2016 at 12:05, Juan Pablo Carbajal <

> ajuanpi+dev@

> > wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Neeraj Battan
>> <

> address@hidden

> > wrote:
>>> KaKila: Hi, thanks for having a look at my proposal. Can you please tell
>>> me which are the core projects?
>>>
>>
>> Everything that doesn't say "Package" is most likely core. Exception
>> is in "Infracstructure" the package manager.
>> With your profile I would also consider that project.
>>
> 
> The projects page should be cleared up then.  The logical operations on
> polygons are listed under missing core functions but would actually go
> into the mapping package.

IMO they better fit in the geometry package. That already contains several
functions that operate on polygons.
Until recently oc_polybool() actually was in there, it was removed (as
JuanPi told me) because its author wanted so (it's now in octclip).

Philip



--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/regarding-GSoC-2016-tp4675803p4675852.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.