Re: Proposal for a team of admins

[c.]

On 12 Jan 2017, at 13:23, Julien Bect <address@hidden> wrote:

> But I would like it much better if we could argue rationally about such 
> decisions, based on some explicit, published (and as-objective-as-possible) 
> list of requirements.
> 
> IMO, package acceptance based on the "happiness" of admins is not a good way 
> to attract more contributions.

Having a leader that acts as a "benevolent dictator" who can change the 
requirements at any time at his/her own will, 
and is also responsible of verifying whether the requirements are met, it makes 
no real difference.

So I would not really spend to much effort setting up a complex "democratic" 
decision making infrastructure when it is only 
a matter of superficial appearance.

c.