[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Complex mappers for real values
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
Re: Complex mappers for real values |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jun 2017 10:06:05 -0700 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170306 (1.8.0) |
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 20:40:14 -0700, Rik wrote:
> Does anyone know if the following comment in lo-mappers.h still applies?
>
> // C++ now provides versions of the following functions for arguments of
> // type std::complex<T> and T. But some compilers (I'm looking at you,
> // clang) apparently don't get this right yet... So we provide our own
> // wrappers for real-valued arguments.
I would be surprised if it *didn't* still apply. This change was made
only 10 months ago, in response to the following thread:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2016-08/msg00089.html
--
mike
- Complex mappers for real values, Rik, 2017/06/21
- Re: Complex mappers for real values, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2017/06/21
- Re: Complex mappers for real values,
Mike Miller <=
- Re: Complex mappers for real values, Mike Miller, 2017/06/22
- Re: Complex mappers for real values, Mike Miller, 2017/06/22
- Re: Complex mappers for real values, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2017/06/22
- Re: Complex mappers for real values, Mike Miller, 2017/06/22
- Re: Complex mappers for real values, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2017/06/22
- Re: Complex mappers for real values, Mike Miller, 2017/06/22
- Re: Complex mappers for real values, Rik, 2017/06/23