[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnulib is no longer an hg subrepo
From: |
Kai Torben Ohlhus |
Subject: |
Re: gnulib is no longer an hg subrepo |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:13:02 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 |
On 3/31/20 10:47 PM, "Markus Mützel" wrote:
> Am 27. Januar 2020 um 17:46 Uhr schrieb "John W. Eaton":
>> On 1/27/20 3:29 AM, "Markus Mützel" wrote:
>>> Am 27. Januar 2020 um 07:41 Uhr schrieb "John W. Eaton":
>>
>>>> That seems good to me. We could maintain our own patched version of the
>>>> bootstrap script but it seems to me that it would be better to have
>>>> something like this added to the version that is provided in gnulib.
>>>
>>> Maybe we could patch our own version and see whether this works as expected
>>> across different systems, version of git, etc.
>>> When (or if) we are confident that this is a good addition, we could donate
>>> the change upstream.
>>
>> OK, I pushed your changes on stable and merged with default. Then I
>> updated gnulib on default (not sure whether we want to do that on stable
>> just before the release?) and then ran bootstrap --bootstrap-sync
>> followed by reapplying your changes to preserve them after the updates
>> to the bootstrap script from gnulib. Updating the bootstrap script from
>> the gnulib version is now more difficult because we have to remember to
>> reapply our local changes. Thankfully, the gnulib bootstrap script
>> doesn't appear to be changing much now. But it would still be good to
>> get this modification accepted in gnulib if it works out for us. Let's
>> see what happens with the buildbots when they get these changes.
>
> We are using these changes since a couple of months now. So far no one was
> complaining about them.
> Should we submit it upstream now (together with Mike's follow up fix)? Or
> better wait until we actually moved to a newer gnulib revision and see if the
> logic does what we expect on different systems?
>
> In any case, I am not sure where this should be submitted. Does gnulib have a
> tracker?
>
> Markus
>
Since that change I am really happy about Octave's repository, which is
much more manageable with local clones now.
According to the gnulib website [1], bugs should be reported to their
mailing list [2].
Kai
[1] https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/
[2] address@hidden
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: gnulib is no longer an hg subrepo,
Kai Torben Ohlhus <=