paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Paparazzi-devel] New GPS module from sparkfun


From: akochevar
Subject: RE: [Paparazzi-devel] New GPS module from sparkfun
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:36:12 -0700
User-agent: Web-Based Email 4.14.7

I bit the bullet last night and ordered one.  Looked too intriguing to pass up.  Ill let you guys know how it performs. 

AJ

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] New GPS module from sparkfun
From: "Daniel Morgan" <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, October 07, 2008 6:07 am
To: address@hidden

To be honest with you guys i have always had better luck with the LEA-4P chipset. Even in terms of accuracy. I have found some weird issues with it. I mean the 5H works ok but i would still rather use a 4p

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Steffen S. <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi!

I found this and wanted to share it with you guys:
Someone on another forum (www.mikrokopter.de) found out, that the LEA5H has problems with constant datarates, when receiving more than 8 satellites
(already turned off all extra stuff). He says the LEA4 chip performs much better and gives a constant update rate all the time.


Link to his Post(German):
http://forum.mikrokopter.de/topic-post75750.html#post75750


Cheers,
   Steffen


--Weitergeleitete E-Mail-Anlagen--
From: address@hiddenDate: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:03:49 -0700

Subject: RE: [Paparazzi-devel] New GPS module from sparkfun

As Jeremy pointed out on the wiki, they used the wrong antenna.  A passive antenna would have been perfect, but they used the active....  Makes me wonder why?  Possibly something wrong in the design, who knows.  Great price though!

AJ



-------- Original Message --------

Subject: [Paparazzi-devel] New GPS module from sparkfun

From: Yves Touchette <address@hidden>

Date: Mon, October 06, 2008 2:18 pm

Hey guys,

Take a look at this:

It's a dream come true ;)

A GPS module with a Ublox 5H and a sarantel Geohelix.

The only issue might be the connector, but I guess the best thing to do would be to remove the flex cable and solder wires directly to the PCB.

What do you guys think?

-yvest


Upgrade to Hotmail Plus and share more photos with bigger attachments. Click here to find out how Click here to find out how
_______________________________________________

Paparazzi-devel mailing list

address@hidden

http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel



_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel



_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]