[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Paparazzi-devel] LPC2148 performance

From: Steve Joyce
Subject: [Paparazzi-devel] LPC2148 performance
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:51:47 +0100

Has anyone ever done any profiling on the airborne code to see how how many extra cycles are available in the various loops? I don't really have a good feeling for how much extra code you could sqeeze in there. Are there tools available for that type of analysis?

What would actually happen if you exceeded the available instructions within a loop?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]