paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Wireless link


From: Jeremy Reinertsen
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Wireless link
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:59:10 +1000

Please explain how to use the -udp option.

I am using Ubiquity Bullet radios as well and wrote a Bash script which pipes comms from a virtual serial port (pty) to UDP. It would be great to do this from within Paparazzi.

Cheers

Jeremy

----- Original Message ----- From: "antoine drouin" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Wireless link


check the -udp option of the "link" programm

regards

Poine

On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:11 AM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
The other consideration is power consumption.
The XBee module will consume less power than the wifi module.
________________________________
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf
Of Gareth Roberts
Sent: vendredi, 26. mars 2010 20:10
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Wireless link

Hi Marcio,

Welcome to the mailing list!
I'm using a similar setup to communicate with a small linux SBC. It's a
complete pain which I would avoid if I had any other possible option.
AD-HOC networks are shaky and the range is nothing compared to the XBee's.
The nice thing about XBees, which I appreciate more and more working with
AD-HOC is that once they are set up properly, you plug them in and they just
work.
Unless you desperately need to trade range for bandwidth (which, if you are
using it with a standard paparazzi, you won't) I would seriously recommend
against it.
A pair of XBee's will cost you about £70 from here:
http://www.coolcomponents.co.uk/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=25_64&products_id=298
Your module would be cheaper, but you'll have to sign a fairly horrible
looking NDA before buying one, which will mean you can't legally tell anyone
else any information about the module (so we won't be able to answer
questions about it). I'm not sure whether the module will operate under
Linux properly either.

Others may disagree, but if you're new to the system and autopilots in
general, the less weird stuff you have to deal with the better - it can be
tricky enough getting everything working if it's standard!

Good luck!
--G

On 26/03/10 13:40, Marcio Montenegro wrote:

Hi all,
A newbie question:
Can I use a low cost wi-fi module for wireless link on paparazzi ?
The ground station laptop connects to wi-fi module using AD-HOC.
Course I also need a microcontroller to control the wi-fi module
but it´s easy to do.Thanks.

http://www.semiconductorstore.com/cart/pc/viewPrd.asp?idproduct=44219


_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel


_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel




_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]