[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Paparazzi-devel] New uC Target with FPU?

From: mark.griffin
Subject: RE: [Paparazzi-devel] New uC Target with FPU?
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:42:45 +0200

Hi Chris & Antoine,
Thanks for your replies/comments.
Yes, I agree that it's better to spend efforts on something more
advanced such as the STM32. 
I'll order an Olimex STM32-H103 board and play around with it (I have
successfully modified the Olimex LPC-H2148 board to look like a Tiny
Cheers, Mark 

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On
Behalf Of Chris
Sent: Tuesday, 6 July 2010 6:42 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: [Paparazzi-devel] Reply to:"RE: New ?C Target with

I don't know much about Ardupilot but from what i have read so far about
it doesn't even come close to Paparazzi.
The Paparazzi autopilot (twog or tiny) works every time and it is very 
for long flights from my experience.
I do program a lot for AVR and i can't see how an AVR cpu can be 
compared to an ARM one.
The power of AVR cpu is significantly less than the ARM one and floating

point math would
overload it i think.
The STM32 really has everything that is needed for an advanced autopilot

and that is the way
the tiny or twog should evolve i think.
Only my opinion.

Paparazzi-devel mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]