paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Paparazzi on Linux and Lisa design questions


From: Chris Gough
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Paparazzi on Linux and Lisa design questions
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:29:11 +1000

I don't think restructuring the page hierarchy to different audiences
(with namespaces) is the answer, the existing page taxonomy (General,
Hardware, Software, Miscellaneous) is perfectly sensible.

What if there was a UserManual category (with subcategories such as
GettingStarted), where a less knowledge reader is assumed?

Also, this looks interesting (but might not be ripe yet)
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:DoxyWiki#English:_DoxyWiki_history_and_rationale

Chris Gough


On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:25 AM, antoine drouin <address@hidden> wrote:
> a simpler bloc diagram :
>  http://paparazzi.enac.fr/wiki_images/Lisa_l_bloc_diag_simple.png
>
> I have started to split the doc for Lisa between a developer part and
> a user part, but it's still mostly empty for now.
> I think we should do the same for the rest of the wiki : users don't
> want to be overwhelmed with too technical informations, and developers
> don't want to lose time with a bunch of details that may look trivial
> to them.
>
> Now how do we get the search function of the wiki to handle that
> user/developer separation ? tags ? using two wikis ?
> What you guys think ?
>
> Regards
>
> Poine
>
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Tilman Baumann <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Thanks.
>> I'm not sure if anything that complex should be my first contact with
>> paparazzi but it sounds totally awesome.
>> Will see, I have to probably ease myself into this whole thing module by
>> module, it is all happening under tight financial pressure. :)
>>
>> But I guess when I have that board and try some examples, I will find out
>> rather quick how it all fits together...
>>
>> Regards
>>  Tilman
>>
>> On 5 Aug 2010, at 21:51, antoine drouin wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Tilman
>>>
>>> There's a block schematic of Lisa/L on the wiki
>>>
>>> http://paparazzi.enac.fr/wiki/Image:Lisa_bd.png
>>>
>>> As you see, the board contains a STM32 (cortexM3 @ 72Mhz) with all
>>> peripherals exposed ( UARTS, I2C, SPI, ADCs, CAN, input capture, PWMs)
>>> and a socket for a gumstix Overo ( OMAP3 at 600Mhz). The link between
>>> the two processor is done by SPI and served by DMA on both sides (so
>>> alot of bandwith with little CPU overhead).
>>> This architecture is designed to be flexible: the STM32 has the
>>> potential to run all the current Paparazzi software alone ( that would
>>> be one side of the spektrum ) or the STM32 can be used only as IO
>>> processor and you can run your autopilot on the Overo ( that would be
>>> the other end of the spektrum ). Of course anything in between is
>>> possible, like for example running stabilization on the STM32 and
>>> navigation on the Overo.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if that answers your questions. Sorry for the late answer
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Poine
>>>
>>> ps: I know the doc about Lisa sucks. I'm focusing on software those
>>> days but I promise I'll work on documentation as soon as possible
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>



-- 
.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]