[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Possible board for paparazzi?
From: |
Marc Schwarzbach |
Subject: |
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Possible board for paparazzi? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:02:14 +0200 |
Hi,
for many tasks I agree the current boards are fine (using several of them quite
often).
But as soon as you start thinkig about IMU instead of IR you see the
limitations of the platform.
The LISA looks great for itself, but if you start getting all the components
you need, like IMU, OVERO, and the board itself, you end up paying 700€ or more
and having several boards and suppliers.
So the idea with the roboard would be to have one board availible which does it
all and has the power for much more. You could use cheaper sensors and have an
EKF. And as the platform is a x86, the code should be portable to other similar
designed boards.
It will definitely need some work, probably thinking about the process of
compiling (could be done on the board...).
It depends on my future occupation if I can invest much time on this... And on
the community interest, of course.
Regards
Marc
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:47:36 +0100
> Von: "Tilman Baumann" <address@hidden>
> An: address@hidden
> Betreff: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Possible board for paparazzi?
> Marc Schwarzbach wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > a few days ago I had a board on my table (included in a quadcopter)
> which
> > seems to be a possible platform for paparazzi. So I just wanted to ask
> for
> > your opinion.
> >
> > (Short specs:Vortex86DX, 1GHz, 256Mb RAM, 6 serial ports, 16 sevo
> outputs,
> > analogue, i2c..., 40g, 5V 400mA) Runs Linux, Windows...
> > Price: about 230€
> >
> > Here´s the Link:
> > http://www.roboard.com/RB-110.htm
> >
> > Since there have been attemps to run Paparazzi airborne code on a Linux
> > machine it is probbly not a huge problem to port it?
>
> Well, all the IO parts (servo, RC, sensors) have not been tackled yet.
> But I guess it would be greatly appreciated if you would do those.
> That board does indeed look like a very fine platform.
>
> > Pobably a realtime linux as a basis would b needed?
>
> Good question. Tt would probably not hurt to do that. Not sure if it would
> be required though. Has anybody already thought about that?
>
> > Regarding the power of the board I see things like wind calculation on
> > board, EKF-filtering of IMU, having SRTM-files and SD-logging on board
> and
> > much capacity for other applications.
> > And the price is not much higher then a Tiny board...
>
> Indeed. Should have enough power.
> Not sure though if it is more attractive then a gumstix or beagleboard
> together with one of the popular breakout boards. Especially from a
> community point of view. (see my recent post on the list. I had some
> totally unfounded ideas about that recently. )
> They are cheap as well.
>
> > Hope I´m not totally wrong...
>
> Well, theoretically not. Could still be lots of work though. :)
>
> The feedback that I got was mainly, why change it. Paparazzi runs fine on
> a standalone small embedded board. It does not have vast computing power,
> but it works. You could always put a Linux on top for telemetry, and
> 'intelligence'.
>
> Lisa seems to be a hybrid development that mixes both worlds. It can run
> paprarazzi self contained, but it can also run as a mere IO processor and
> run most of the airborne bode in Linux. It is more expensive then your
> board though. :)
>
>
> Regards
> Tilman Baumann
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
--
Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief!
Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail
- RE: [Paparazzi-devel] Xbee pro modules won't communicate, (continued)
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Xbee pro modules won't communicate, Nathan Aherne, 2010/08/09
- RE: [Paparazzi-devel] Xbee pro modules won't communicate, Edixon Giraldo, 2010/08/09
- RE: [Paparazzi-devel] Xbee pro modules won't communicate, address@hidden, 2010/08/10
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Xbee pro modules won't communicate, Felix Ruess, 2010/08/10
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Xbee pro modules won't communicate, Felix Ruess, 2010/08/10
- [Paparazzi-devel] Possible board for paparazzi?, Marc Schwarzbach, 2010/08/10
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Possible board for paparazzi?, Tilman Baumann, 2010/08/10
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Possible board for paparazzi?,
Marc Schwarzbach <=
- RE: [Paparazzi-devel] Possible board for paparazzi?, mark.griffin, 2010/08/11
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Possible board for paparazzi?, Tilman Baumann, 2010/08/10
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Possible board for paparazzi?, Tilman Baumann, 2010/08/10
- RE: [Paparazzi-devel] Xbee pro modules won't communicate **SOLVED**, Edixon Giraldo, 2010/08/14