Re: [Paparazzi-devel] "re:current sensor"

[Felix Ruess]

Hi Ana,

what svn version are you on? ADC_GENERIC was made a module in revision
6303... see http://paparazzi.enac.fr/wiki/Airframe_Configuration#ADC_Generic
We also switched to git for version control of the software a couple
of days ago.
I would really recommend updating! Don't hesitate to ask if you have
any questions/trouble updating, but it is hard to answer questions
regarding some old versions and especially without knowing exactly
which one.

Cheers, Felix

2010/11/23 Ana García Álvarez <address@hidden>:
> Hi,
> thank you felix. I had not completely defined the makefile lines. Now it
> works. I haven't still moved to the new firmware structure, I'll do it in
> the next weeks(i'm working with new hardware and would like to test it with
> the older structure before moving).
>
> I was trying to enable the adc voltage info, but it stays fixed to
> 25.8V(also if I remove the current sensor and use the basic configuration
> milliampatfullthrottle). I don't know if my board has any problem or if it
> is a configuration problem(I have another board where the same configuration
> files do work).
>  I have also tried with the ADC_GENERIC but don't know if I'm doing the
> things well, because I get an ERROR:
> -in the airframe file:
> <section name="adc" prefix="ADC_CHANNEL_">
> <...adcs ir>
> <define name="ADC_GENERIC1" value="ADC_3"/>
> <define name="ADC_GENERIC2" value="ADC_4"/>
> <define name="ADC_NB_SAMPLES" value="16"/>
> </section>
> -then, in the makefile section of the airframe file:
> ap.CFLAGS =DUSE_ADC_GENERIC -DUSE_ADC_3 -DADC_CHANNEL_GENERIC1=ADC_3
> -DUSE_ADC_4 -DADC_CHANNEL_GENERIC2=ADC_4
> ap.srcs = adc_generic.c
> -finally, in the telemetry file I add a line in the ap generic:
> <message name="ADC_GENERIC" period="1"/>
>
> I get the error only if I define the message, I guess I'm declaring wrong
> variables, but after looking in same files like main_fbw.c or adc_generic.c
> I don't know what would work.
>
> I am flying with two batteries, one for the motor and one for the ap, and
> would like to monitor the status of the two. I have thought I could do it
> via the adc_generic for the motor for instance, and using the common
> "milliampatfullthrottle" method with the ap. Could it work?
> Sorry if I am not providing the hole files but I haven't them here with me.
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>