Re: [Paparazzi-devel] UBX vs NMEA Protocol Inquiry

[bernard]

Ideas of things that can be improved are always welcome.
But as always with these things... people develop what they're interested in.
Which I guess is why the NMEA stuff hasn't been fully developed as the
people who have been active developers were happy enough with using the
existing GPS functionality.

No one is an expert on everything and so there's always things that can be
improved. :-)

Cheers,
Bernie.

> Thanks for the invitation Bernie! Â I'll certainly do just that.
>
> It seems like a lot of the work has already been done, so it probably
> won't be all that much work. Â Unfortunately I'm still a ways from getting
> to the point of working on it. Â I've actually just recently signed up for
> a github account.
>
> Hopefully it is acceptable on this list to comment on things you're not
> actually working on just yet. Â It's definately on my list of things to
> do!
>
>
> -Jake
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: address@hidden
>> Sent: 03/12/12 03:49 PM
>> To: address@hidden
>> Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] UBX vs NMEA Protocol Inquiry
>>
>> Jake,
>>
>> Since you know so much about the NMEA protocol maybe you might like to
>> contribute some of that knowledge into code.
>>
>> The Paparazzi source is available from
>> http://github.com/paparazzi/paparazzi
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bernie.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>