Re: [Paparazzi-devel] CAN on Lisa

[Tilman Baumann]

On 14/08/12 16:28, Tilman Baumann wrote:

Should we keep the API defined in ./sw/airborne/arch/stm32/mcu_periph/can_arch.c?

Considering that is is not actually used anywhere I would not feel too bad to scrap it.
The thing is that the libopencm3 API is quite different. And I would like to take advantage of the hardware filters in the chip more.

can_hw_init() and can_hw_transmit() would practically be the same. But I would like to change the rx_callback method so that every module could register it's own callback.
Which would make the code quite stm32 specific, I admit. More generic abstractions could be possible though.

I may have misread the specs there. I can have many filters. But not a receive FIFO each.
Well, that makes it kind of easy. Forget what I said. :)