paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] completely dropping AVR support


From: Felix Ruess
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] completely dropping AVR support
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:26:51 +0100

I guess some recent ones would run it fine. But this of course heavily depends on which firmware, subsystems and frequencies you configure.
Also you would need to bring the avr code up to date again first.

Cheers, Felix

On Mar 20, 2013 8:18 PM, "Eduardo lavratti" <address@hidden> wrote:
I have a question, AVR have power to run latest version of  paparazzi ?




Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:15:41 -0600
From: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] completely dropping AVR support

Heinrich,

Keep in mind the code can always be resurrected from the old commit, so if you do decide to experiment with AVRs again in the future, one can always just checkout an older commit and start bringing the code up to date. Should be easy to find in the commit messages.

Thanks,
-Stephen Dwyer


On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:25 PM, AJ Kochevar <address@hidden> wrote:
Felix,
Does this mean that my vintage 1.2.1 and Lite boards will be obsolete?  Aw man, I was just thinking about how fun it would be to get my parallel port programmer out and play with them.  *cough* SARCASM *cough*
 
AJ

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Felix Ruess <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Heinrich,

personally I'm not interested in AVR support at all...
If you (or someone else) want's to update and maintain it, we would be more than happy to keep support for it.
But as it is right now it doesn't make any sense.

Cheers, Felix


On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich Warmers <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Felix,
there are some  new low cost autopilots (<65$) with  the atmega1280.
Since  this processor has 256kB rom it may be a good idea  to use Paparazzi on it.
Heinrich

Felix Ruess schrieb:
Hi all,

we plan to finally completely drop AVR support as it has been unused and unmaintained for quite a long time now.

So if someone is still using this, we would like to hear about it.
I think some antenna tracker code is still using _some_ parts of the AVR arch, but unless this is all really useful and needed it should be moved out.

In any case, as long as we don't have someone willing to maintain the AVR arch, it will have to go sooner or later...

Cheers, Felix

_______________________________________________ Paparazzi-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel

_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel



_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel



_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel



_______________________________________________ Paparazzi-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel

_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]