paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] drotek 10dof v2 imu


From: Eduardo lavratti
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] drotek 10dof v2 imu
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:34:10 -0300

Hello Felix, i do a fast tes today. I cant do extensive test because i am using my production twog.

Well, with my own driver IMU using MPU60x0 and 5883 as slave work perfect.

With drotek branch it not receive any data from sensors.
Hendrix, can you send the airframe file used in this test ?
I not have time to check if my airframe are right so using your file i not waste time.

Eduardo


> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:51:38 +0300
> From: address@hidden
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] drotek 10dof v2 imu
>
> I will now install the imu_drotek branch on a different directory and
> check it tomorrow at work.
> About the mag, mine works like a charm with those signs, checked with a
> gps and a traditional
> compass (all other in the airframe set to 1) and the imu positioned with
> the solder pad row facing back and the ic side (mag,mpu,baro) looking up.
>
> x = (int16_t) ((drotek_hmc5883l.buf[0] << 8) | drotek_hmc5883l.buf[1]);
> z = (int16_t) ((drotek_hmc5883l.buf[2] << 8) | drotek_hmc5883l.buf[3]);
> y = (int16_t) ((drotek_hmc5883l.buf[4] << 8) | drotek_hmc5883l.buf[5]);
>
> VECT3_ASSIGN(imu.mag_unscaled, x, -y, -z);
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> On 06/20/2013 07:25 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> > Did you already have a chance to test the imu_drotek branch?
> > You should be able to have a rather empty imu section (except mag calib,
> > body_to_imu and accel neutrals if you want).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]