[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] drotek 10dof v2 imu
From: |
Chris |
Subject: |
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] drotek 10dof v2 imu |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:01:41 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
Hi Felix i think it is working fine now :-)
Here are some RAW sample values and since the "x" axis only remain the same
and all other are reversed in my setup, the recorded values look correct.
Also note that i removed all my definitions about the sensitivity and
let the default values
defined in the driver files.
I think that it should be noted that if you follow this orientation the
imu must be positioned
with the ICs facing down including the barometer.
axis my driver(+-16g) new driver(+-8g)
ax -63 -128
ay 20 -41
az -1964 3909
gp 22 44
gq 14 -30
gr -6 12
mx -206 -204
my 90 -86
mz 399 -397
Chris
On 06/20/2013 10:00 PM, address@hidden wrote:
Would be great if you could test again and check the scale as well as the
axes assignment.
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] drotek 10dof v2 imu, (continued)
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] drotek 10dof v2 imu, Chris, 2013/06/20
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] drotek 10dof v2 imu, Chris, 2013/06/20
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] drotek 10dof v2 imu, Chris, 2013/06/20
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] drotek 10dof v2 imu, Chris, 2013/06/20
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] drotek 10dof v2 imu, Chris, 2013/06/20
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] drotek 10dof v2 imu,
Chris <=
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] drotek 10dof v2 imu, Chris, 2013/06/21