|Subject:||Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Why krooz use int_euler stabilization|
|Date:||Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:32:59 -0200|
only to confirm ... i testes krooz with both and not see any difference.
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:32:50 +0100
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Why krooz use int_euler stabilization
Hi,which stabilization system you use is not tied to the board.
The euler implementation is easier to understand, but can't deal with the singularities that a Euler representation inherently has...Why Sergey chose int_euler I don't know... how stable it flies IMHO mostly depends on tuning (the same parameters for both won't give you the same result).
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Eltonwu <address@hidden> wrote:
I don't know the difference between the quat and euler
_______________________________________________ Paparazzi-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|