[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Phpgroupware-users] Anouncement: eGroupWare fork of phpGroupWare
From: |
SI Reasoning |
Subject: |
Re: [Phpgroupware-users] Anouncement: eGroupWare fork of phpGroupWare |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:41:42 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.3 |
If my understanding is correct, the major issue between the two camps has to
do with license preferences. A possible solution could be to have a
phpgroupware plug-ins that could be created offsite but plugged into a
phpgroupware module if an end-user so desires. This keeps phpgroupware GPL
clean while also allowing end-users a choice to plug-in non-gpl code. If my
understanding is correct, I believe that it is not incompatible with the gpl
to add non-gpl plugins.
On Friday 05 September 2003 01:10 pm, R B wrote:
> G'day,
> It's good to have varieties but I hope
> phpgroupware & egroupware are not going to turn into
> phpnuke/postnuke/evolution/etc with apps having
> problem working in each other. The developers are
> having nightmares trying to write code to conform to
> all of them (well at least the major forks anyway). To
> the users, there are not much different between them.
> Just bugs are slower at getting fixed due to scattered
> of resources.
> I wish phpgroupware/egroupware will not have that
> sort of problem.
> As a normal user, I would like to make a suggestion
> (even it may seem stupid). Maybe I've been missing the
> point but from what I've seen is that phpgroupware and
> egroupware have two different business model.
> Technically, the two are still the same - ie. the
> underlying architecture is still the same - then why
> not have a central group that coordinate the
> developement of the core structure, much like the
> Linux Kernel.
>
> Regards,
>
> Robert Bui
>
>
>
> --- SI Reasoning <address@hidden> wrote: > It
> would be wonderful for those of us caught in the
>
> > crossfire if modules from
> > both projects are drop in replaceable without issue
> > (such as anglemail).
> >
> > Also, which modules where the primary interests of
> > the egroupware developers?
>
> http://search.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Search
> - Looking for more? Try the new Yahoo! Search
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phpgroupware-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-users
Re: [Phpgroupware-users] Anouncement: eGroupWare fork of phpGroupWare, Ralf Becker, 2003/09/04
Re: [Phpgroupware-users] Anouncement: eGroupWare fork of phpGroupWare, Dave Hall, 2003/09/05
Re: [Phpgroupware-users] Anouncement: eGroupWare fork of phpGroupWare, Chris Weiss, 2003/09/05