[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Platero-devel] Re: platero
From: |
Javier Hernández |
Subject: |
[Platero-devel] Re: platero |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 02:14:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Hi,
Althought I'm new to your project, I would like to give my opipion. If it
doesn't make sense, please ignore it.
Please, Andreas, commit your code for the gui protocol, because my code is
only a quick&dirty hack of the old code, your code should be much better.
Also, I would like to know what do you think about the sources list, I think
that the code is a bit cpu and mem consuming. Maybe there is a better way of
do it.
I agree with the Makefile stuff.
In order to make some publicity, I think we should also announce the program
in apps.kde.com and freshmeat.net, because there is already a program called
"kmldonkey" which can generate some confusion to users.
Javier.
PS: I think that we need an updated TODO file, to take care of the remaining
things to do and the priority of each one.
Best regards
El Jueves, 20 de Marzo de 2003 01:12, Andreas Lauser escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I've got Internet access at last (You know I've moved a month ago). The
> first thing I did was updating the networking code so that it supports all
> Gui protocols up to 14 (that's 2.04beta). after a CVS update I found out
> that this has been already done :-). Nevertheless I also made the
> Opcode<->Primitive stuff much cleaner (no more ugly array hacks), so my
> work was not completely for the trash can :-).
>
> Another question: Does anybody object to removing all dynamically created
> files from CVS (the Makefile.* in particular). IMO they only make
> trouble...
>
> CU
> AND
>
> PS: I think we could use some publicity. maybe we should prepare a beta
> tarball (I think we are far enough for that!) and drop the mldonkey guys a
> note to put us into their news section (like kmldonkey)