[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MISSING Subcommand

From: Jason Stover
Subject: Re: MISSING Subcommand
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 09:14:58 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/

On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 05:27:55PM +0800, John Darrington wrote:
> I'm wondering if there's a better way we can implement the /MISSING
> subcommand which appears in nearly all of the stats commands.
> Currently, it's up to each procedure to explicitly implement it, which
> is both a pain and error prone.
> Perhaps we could pass a parameter to the case_reader when its
> constructed so that it returns only the appropriate cases?

This is a good idea. Sometimes procedures need the missing values, but
usually they are dropped. Passing a parameter to the case_reader would
be an easy way to take care of both situations.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]