[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: time to check in?

From: Jason Stover
Subject: Re: time to check in?
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:43:14 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/

On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:17:43PM +0800, John Darrington wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 09:53:12AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>      I'm beginning to wonder whether it would be better to check in
>      the set of changes we have now.  It has changed from being a
>      brief "reorganization" to a major code cleanup.  That's not
>      necessarily a bad thing, but it means that it becomes more
>      difficult to coordinate.  CVS isn't perfect but it does make it
>      easier to coordinate changes.
>      We don't have to get the file names perfect yet.  As long as a
>      ChangeLog exists to explain what's been done (I assume you'll be
>      adding your own ChangeLog entries before you check in), we can
>      figure out what happened over a series of renames.
>      Also I worry about becoming less transparent to outsiders.
>      Anyone who looks at the CVS tree at the moment will think nothing
>      much is going on.  That's certainly not true.
>      I dunno.  What do you guys think?
> Let's do the renaming, as good as we reasonably can, and then
> check-in.   
> Oh, and can we make a decision about lib/linreg ?  I'm of the opinion
> that everything except sweep.[ch] should be moved to src/math

Do you mean to make a directory called src/math/linreg with all
the linreg code in it, or just mv lib/linreg/*  src/math/ ? (With
the exception of sweep.)


SDF Public Access UNIX System -

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]