Re: next release criteria

[Ben Pfaff]

Jason Stover <address@hidden> writes:

> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 09:07:39PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> I know that we started a discussion of criteria for the next
>> release.  I stated a couple of things myself, but I don't think I
>> ever saw any replies.  What would others like to see in the next
>> release?
>
> A limited GLM procedure that allows users to study interactions among
> variables would be good. GLM likely would be one of the most widely
> useful statistical procedures. I was planning to start working on it
> after finishing the ARMA time-series routines, but I could start
> working on it sooner.

The features I want to implement for the next release will take
at least a couple of months, so I doubt there's any hurry--unless
any of you think that some of those features aren't worthwhile
for the next release.
-- 
"To the engineer, the world is a toy box full of sub-optimized and
 feature-poor toys."
--Scott Adams