pspp-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: enum listwise vs. pariwise


From: Jason Stover
Subject: Re: enum listwise vs. pariwise
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:29:53 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 08:40:04PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Jason Stover <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Right now, LISTWISE and PAIRWISE are enum constants in
> > covariance-matrix.h.
> >
> > Pairwise vs. listwise deletion will be a consideration for many other
> > procedures. John suggested putting them in a common location, probably
> > missing-values.h.
> >
> > So what does everyone think of adding the following to
> > missing-values.h?
> >
> > enum mv_handling
> > {
> >     MV_PAIRWISE,
> >     MV_LISTWISE
> > };
> 
> OK.  Can you make the prefix MVH_, though, so that I don't
> confuse these with the existing MV_ constants?

OK. Before I check it in, you mean:

enum mvh_handling
{
        MVH_PAIRWISE,
        MVH_LISTWISE
};

?




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]