[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: Package: pspp-0.6.1-3.fc11 Tag: dist-f11 Status: failed Built

From: Ben Pfaff
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Package: pspp-0.6.1-3.fc11 Tag: dist-f11 Status: failed Built by: ausil]
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:00:47 -0700
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)

Matěj Cepl <address@hidden> writes:

> What is the status of pspp on sparc64 architecture? I've got this from
> our build system today (Sparc64 is a secondary architecture for Fedora,
> so it is not that big deal for me) when building pspp-0.6.1.
> Particularly the issue is that one test fails. Original email with full
> information about logs etc. is in the bottom of this message.

PSPP is supposed to be portable to 64-bit architectures and to
big-endian architectures.  In other words, it should work on

In fact, when I build pspp-0.6.1.tar.gz on a Debian sparc machine
(the only sparc I have access to), all the tests pass.

Maybe I need to build some other way?  I didn't pass -m64 to GCC,
should I?

Here is the info on that machine (more general info at

    (lenny)address@hidden:~/pspp-0.6.1$ gcc -v
    Using built-in specs.
    Target: sparc-linux-gnu
    Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 4.3.2-1.1' 
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --enable-shared 
--with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext 
--enable-threads=posix --enable-nls --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.3 
--program-suffix=-4.3 --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug 
--enable-objc-gc --enable-mpfr --with-cpu=v8 --with-long-double-128 
--enable-checking=release --build=sparc-linux-gnu --host=sparc-linux-gnu 
    Thread model: posix
    gcc version 4.3.2 (Debian 4.3.2-1.1) 
    (lenny)address@hidden:~/pspp-0.6.1$ uname -a
    Linux smetana 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Thu May 28 22:22:37 UTC 2009 
sparc64 GNU/Linux
"Because computer source code is an expressive means for the exchange
 of information and ideas about computer programming, we hold that it
 is protected by the First Amendment."
--Hon. Boyce F. Martin, Jr., for the 6th Circuit Court, Junger vs. Daley

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]