[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Next step in covariance matrix
|
From: |
Jason Stover |
|
Subject: |
Re: Next step in covariance matrix |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:45:16 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:56:18PM +0000, John Darrington wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 03:20:20PM -0400, Jason Stover wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:25:32PM +0000, John Darrington wrote:
> > Will that be enough to allow a subset of GLM to be implemented?
>
> Yes, except for the interactions.
>
> But some tasks can be done without interactions, can't they?
Many.
Re: Next step in covariance matrix, John Darrington, 2009/10/31