pspp-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Multiplication Sign vs. Bullet Operator


From: John Darrington
Subject: Re: Multiplication Sign vs. Bullet Operator
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:11:30 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Thanks Friedrich,

There may be cultural influences at play here.

I think in English speaking countries the  x is more common - at least in 
printed material - 
and it is used to what I am seeing, although I do write it with a dot when 
writing by hand.


The dot, has a problem, that in English speaking lands it can be confused with  
the decimal 
separator - that of course is not a problem in continental Europe where the 
comma is used as
the decimal separator.

What we could do, is to mark this string as translatable.  That way, the 
translators can use
x . or whatever they think appropriate.


J'


On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:21:44AM +0200, Friedrich Beckmann wrote:
     I changed this with commit
     
     
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/pspp.git/commit/?h=gtk3&id=dc93fae2746573f1e71d93fbc297b48dc0c32b90
     
     to the use of the multiplication sign. This is then according to:
     
     
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Scientific_and_engineering_notation
     
     and looks like this:
     
     
     
     Thanks for the hint! I always wrote it with dot, but obviously the 
recommended way is
     the multiplication sign ?x?.
     
     Friedrich

-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]