Re: RES: Crosstables and order by

[Ben Pfaff]

OK, how do you compute the "vote" then?  One way, I suppose,
would be to sort by the row or column total.

"Clayton Santos Delfino" <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi Ben,
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> Look the result for a table in attached file.
>
> I think that a possible order by to "afreq" and "dfreq" options could be
> over the result computed to the "count" parameter in /cells.
>
> The idea is identify which entries to "B" had major e minor presence
> (vote). For example, in this case, the major is Blinda.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Clayton
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Ben Pfaff [mailto:address@hidden 
> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 26 de maio de 2011 01:41
> Para: Clayton Santos Delfino
> Cc: address@hidden
> Assunto: Re: Crosstables and order by
>
> "Clayton Santos Delfino" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> When we are using frequencies transformations is possible to order the
>
>> result by dfreq and afreq but we don't have this option for 
>> crosstables.
>>
>> I think that will be a great feature we have this option in this 
>> transformation.
>>
>> What do you think about this?
>
> I don't know how it would work.  Suppose the crosstabulation looks like
> this, where the entries in cells are counts:
>
>             A
>        -----------
>          1   2   3
>   | 1  100 300 200
> B | 2  200 200 300
>   | 3  300 100 100
>
> In AFREQ mode, what is the correct sort order for variables A and B?
> --
> Ben Pfaff
> http://benpfaff.org
>

-- 
Ben Pfaff 
http://benpfaff.org