pspp-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Pspp-users Digest discussion of cluster assignment scores


From: Fredrik Clementz
Subject: Re: Pspp-users Digest discussion of cluster assignment scores
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 22:39:37 +0200

Hi Mark,

I really can't tell the difference between the two techniques you refer to. If both end up with the relationship each variable has with the dependant (cluster)? If you have a variable which has a strong relationship to cluster 1 but not 2 it will tell "One can then look at the distinguishing characteristics of each cluster .."  which is essentially what the relationship parameter in discriminant does (assuming you retrieve Fishers coefficients).

Personally, I prefer other clustering techniques to K-means such as Two step and there you have a very good way of identifying the driving params to each segment.

Cheers,

F


On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Mark Levine <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi folks,

I have to respectfully disagree in part with Fredrik's comments.

I totally agree with him that K-Means does not provide a unique solution. Repeated clustering to determine the stability of a solution is wise council.

I think, however, that Frederik is off re the relationship between clustering and discriminant analysis. In discrim, you start with cases that have been assigned a priori to groups and the analysis seeks to find optimal (linear) combinations of predictor variables that properly assign cases to the groups. It's sort of like multiple regression with a nominal dependent variable. Well, sort of . . .

What Jason has requested (as I have in a previous note) is a vector of scores that identifies which cases fall into which cluster. One can then look at the distinguishing characteristics of each cluster by cross-tabbing, AOVing, etc. the cluster assignment score against other variables.

Without the cluster assignment scores for further analysis, doing K-Means -- or any kind of clustering procedure, e.g. Q-type factor analysis -- is somewhere between relatively and totally useless.

At least in my not so humble estimation.

Cheers,

Mark


On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:00 PM, address@hidden wrote:

Send Pspp-users mailing list submissions to
        address@hidden

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        address@hidden

You can reach the person managing the list at
        address@hidden

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Pspp-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. PSPP K-means quick-cluster: assigning cases (Fredrik Clementz)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:02:01 +0200
From: Fredrik Clementz <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden, "address@hidden"
        <address@hidden>
Subject: PSPP K-means quick-cluster: assigning cases
Message-ID:
        <CA+y-Rt-WGxteonyFvLsJeyaeGtOzM8no22BiGLqv_Q=address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Jason,

The feature you're looking for is Discriminant analysis and is
unfortunately not implemented in PSPP. I also have to mention that you
should be vary about using K-means as a clustering technique. Please
rerandomize data and run several times to see if results are similar as the
technique is dependant on how the data i sorted.

Cheers,

--
Fredrik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/pspp-users/attachments/20130912/e0405bd1/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Pspp-users mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users


End of Pspp-users Digest, Vol 88, Issue 10
******************************************




--
Fredrik Clementz

Reflect AB
Fenixpalatset
Adolf Fredriks Kyrkogata 10, 4tr
111 37 Stockholm

Direkt: 08 - 412 26 94
Fax: 0708 - 27 79 37
Mobil: 0709 - 99 52 36

E-mail: address@hidden
Url: www.reflect.se

Om Reflect
Reflect är ett undersökningsföretag specialiserat på kvantitativa undersökningar. Med undersökningar som verktyg lär vi företag att förstå sina marknader, sin organisation och omvärld. Undersökningarna som genomförs tillsammans med Reflect avser fungera som en språngbräda inför framtiden. Vi levererar beslutsunderlag som snabbt skall kunna användas för att öka utväxlingen i företag och organisationer

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]