[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: CTABLES
From: |
Crichton, Ronald |
Subject: |
RE: CTABLES |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Nov 2015 19:52:44 +0000 |
The value of (C)TABLES for me was the ability to publish the output without
making edits, and that was always a 2-dimensional table. Never a 3-dimensional
table. (More gimmick than value.) An additional value of (C)TABLES was also
the ability to nest variables and include sub-totals, often 2 deep, sometimes 3
(but not often). Seldom used statistics. Mostly count and sum.
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Charles Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, 10 November 2015 4:02 AM
To: Matthias Faeth; Ben Pfaff
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: RE: CTABLES
________________________________
> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:53:41 +0100
> Subject: Re: CTABLES
> From: address@hidden
> To: address@hidden
> CC: address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden
>
> ok. That means for me, that we should abort the request for CTABLES
> until the SPV issue is solved.
>
> 1. Has anybody a different opinion?
I think we should take this issue calmly. The SPV format is a way of showing
the results dynamically allowing it to be edited later form or convert them to
another format, etc. If it's just a broad topic.
I think the important thing here is to collect information relevant to the
implementation of CTABLES and also encouraging support for the work that needs
PSPP project.
Hands who can write code is needed.
> 3. Maybe Frans idea about implementing !Macros could serve as a
> workaround. I think that might be worthwhile to discuss. Any opinions
> on that?
>From my point of view, the implementation of macro is very different and
>deserves a discussion in itself.
I imagine PSPP priorities are implementing more compatible SPSS commands that
equate to the basic package. I think at this point, is unproductive talk about
macros.
CJT
_______________________________________________
Pspp-users mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
CIT is the ACT Large Training Provider of the Year.
Subscribe to CIT Industry Connection - CIT's free, bi monthly publication:
http://cit.edu.au/industry_business/industry_connection/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also privileged. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all
copies of this transmission along with any attachments immediately. You should
not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other
person.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: CTABLES, (continued)
- Re: CTABLES, Ben Pfaff, 2015/11/07
- RE: CTABLES, Charles Johnson, 2015/11/07
- Re: CTABLES, Ben Pfaff, 2015/11/08
- Re: CTABLES, Matthias Faeth, 2015/11/08
- RE: CTABLES, Crichton, Ronald, 2015/11/08
- Re: CTABLES, Ben Pfaff, 2015/11/08
- Re: CTABLES, Matthias Faeth, 2015/11/09
- Re: CTABLES, Ben Pfaff, 2015/11/09
- Re: CTABLES, Matthias Faeth, 2015/11/09
- RE: CTABLES, Charles Johnson, 2015/11/09
- RE: CTABLES,
Crichton, Ronald <=
- RE: CTABLES, Barry Kiefl, 2015/11/09
- Re: CTABLES, Ben Pfaff, 2015/11/16
- SPSS SPV quirk, Alan Mead, 2015/11/08
- Re: SPSS SPV quirk, Ben Pfaff, 2015/11/08
- Production Jobs, John Darrington, 2015/11/08
- RE: Production Jobs, Charles Johnson, 2015/11/08
- Re: Production Jobs, Roberto Gil Saura [UV], 2015/11/08
- Re: Production Jobs, Ben Pfaff, 2015/11/08
- Re: Production Jobs, Matthias Faeth, 2015/11/08
- Re: Production Jobs, Matthias Faeth, 2015/11/08