[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED T
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!" |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:03:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:45:06PM -0500, Mark Hancock wrote:
If the intention is to communicate that versions with odd numbers (e.g.,
0.9.x) are pre-release and versions with even numbers (e.g., 0.8.x or
0.10.x) are stable, then why isn't that described clearly on the Download
page? Currently these are in a table with no indication of this other than
the number.
If the intention is to communicate that Windows versions are not officially
supported and that Windows users are a low priority, then why not have a
landing page for the Windows version (currently labelled "installers") that
provides this information more clearly?
There are two problems with what you are suggesting:
1. The kind of people who complain that PSPP is terrible software and never
works
properly are also the kind of people who don't read instructions.
2. In fact we DO very clearly state on the download page that the only
"supported"
versions are those obtained from ftp.gnu.org - all others one should use with
caution.
However if somebody lands on a third party site instead of ours, then they
won't ever
see that message.
J'
--
Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encryted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!", (continued)
- Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!", Alan Mead, 2016/02/24
- Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!", John Darrington, 2016/02/24
- Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!", Alan Mead, 2016/02/24
- Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!", John Darrington, 2016/02/24
- Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!", Alan Mead, 2016/02/24
- Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!", Mark Hancock, 2016/02/24
- Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!", Frans Houweling, 2016/02/24
- Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!", Alan Mead, 2016/02/25
- Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!", Friedrich Beckmann, 2016/02/25
- Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!", Mark Hancock, 2016/02/24
- Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!",
John Darrington <=
Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!", Alan Mead, 2016/02/25
Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!", Ben Pfaff, 2016/02/27
Re: PSPP should remove the scary, misleading message about "UNRELEASED TEST SOFTWARE! NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE!", Alan Mead, 2016/02/27