qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH for-5.2 00/19] aspeed: mostly cleanups and some extensions


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.2 00/19] aspeed: mostly cleanups and some extensions
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 10:14:43 +0100

On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 14:24, Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/6/20 3:20 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Various fixes improving the support of Aspeed machines.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > C.
> >
> > Cédric Le Goater (16):
> >   m25p80: Return the JEDEC ID twice for mx25l25635e
> >   m25p80: Add support for mx25l25635f
> >   m25p80: Add support for n25q512ax3
> >   aspeed/scu: Fix valid access size on AST2400
> >   aspeed/smc: Fix MemoryRegionOps definition
> >   aspeed/smc: Fix max_slaves of the legacy SMC device
> >   aspeed/sdhci: Fix reset sequence
> >   ftgmac100: Fix registers that can be read
> >   ftgmac100: Fix interrupt status "Packet transmitted on ethernet"
> >   ftgmac100: Fix interrupt status "Packet moved to RX FIFO"
> >   ftgmac100: Change interrupt status when a DMA error occurs
> >   ftgmac100: Check for invalid len and address before doing a DMA
> >     transfer
> >   ftgmac100: Fix integer overflow in ftgmac100_do_tx()
> >   ftgmac100: Improve software reset
> >   aspeed/sdmc: Simplify calculation of RAM bits
> >   aspeed/smc: Open AHB window of the second chip of the AST2600 FMC
> >     controller
> >
> > Joel Stanley (2):
> >   aspeed/sdmc: Perform memory training
> >   aspeed/sdmc: Allow writes to unprotected registers
> >
> > erik-smit (1):
> >   hw/arm/aspeed: Add board model for Supermicro X11 BMC
>
> Peter,
>
> I saw that you just merged that one. I did some minor changes in
> the commit log. Nothing very important.

OK, I'll drop the old version from target-arm.next.

I'm wondering whether it would be simpler to let you just
submit pullreqs for aspeed-specific patches, since we seem
to have quite a lot of them and I'm generally letting you do
the review work anyway. What do you think ? I'm happy
to continue to take them in via target-arm.next if you prefer.

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]