[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] qapi: Restrict LostTickPolicy enum to machine code
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] qapi: Restrict LostTickPolicy enum to machine code |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:37:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 |
+Laurent + qemu-block@
On 9/14/20 11:14 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>
> Unlike the other patches that move code out of misc.json, this one
> doesn't say "allows pulling less declarations/definitions to user-mode."
> Intentional?
TBH I don't remember as this is 6months old.
IIUC the "tick lost" feature is only meaningful when running
virtualized with a RTC profile, so this is pointless for
user-mode binaries and tools.
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] qapi: Restrict LostTickPolicy enum to machine code,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <=