Re: [PATCH 00/15] Protect the block layer with a rwlock: part 3

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 11/23/22 14:45, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> I think this means that if we clean up everything, in the end we'll have
> coroutine_wrapper and coroutine_wrapper_bdrv (the fourth version not in
> the above list, but that Paolo mentioned we may want to have).

Yes, I agree.

> The only thing I'm unsure about is whether coroutine_wrapper_bdrv is
> descriptive enough as a name or whether it should be something more
> explicit like coroutine_wrapper_bdrv_graph_locked.

That's already long and becomes longer if you add "mixed", but perhaps 
co_wrapper_{mixed_,}{bdrv_graph_rdlock,} would be okay?

In other words:

generated_co_wrapper_simple -> co_wrapper
generated_co_wrapper        -> co_wrapper_mixed
generated_co_wrapper_bdrv   -> co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_graph_rdlock

?

Paolo