qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 07/29] target-ppc: Add PMC7/8 to 970 class


From: Tom Musta
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 07/29] target-ppc: Add PMC7/8 to 970 class
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:42:27 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0

On 6/3/2014 4:27 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Compared to PowerISA-compliant CPUs, 970 family has most of them plus
> PMC7/8 which are only present on 970 but not on POWER5 and later CPUs.
> 
> Since we are changing SPRs for Book3s/970 families, let's add them too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target-ppc/cpu.h            |  4 ++++
>  target-ppc/translate_init.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/target-ppc/translate_init.c b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> index e4c9a4c..0fcf918 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> @@ -7442,6 +7442,30 @@ static void gen_spr_book3s_pmu_user(CPUPPCState *env)
>                   0x00000000);
>  }
>  
> +static void gen_spr_970_pmu_hypv(CPUPPCState *env)
> +{
> +    spr_register(env, SPR_970_PMC7, "PMC7",
> +                 SPR_NOACCESS, SPR_NOACCESS,
> +                 &spr_read_generic, &spr_write_generic,
> +                 0x00000000);
> +    spr_register(env, SPR_970_PMC8, "PMC8",
> +                 SPR_NOACCESS, SPR_NOACCESS,
> +                 &spr_read_generic, &spr_write_generic,
> +                 0x00000000);
> +}
> +

Sorry ... forgot my comments: Shouldn't this be named "gen_spr_970_pm_sup" ?  
These are supervisor SPRs, not hypervisor SPRs.

> +static void gen_spr_970_pmu_user(CPUPPCState *env)
> +{
> +    spr_register(env, SPR_970_UPMC7, "UPMC7",
> +                 &spr_read_ureg, SPR_NOACCESS,
> +                 &spr_read_ureg, SPR_NOACCESS,
> +                 0x00000000);
> +    spr_register(env, SPR_970_UPMC8, "UPMC8",
> +                 &spr_read_ureg, SPR_NOACCESS,
> +                 &spr_read_ureg, SPR_NOACCESS,
> +                 0x00000000);
> +}
> +

Are UPMC7/8 writeable from supervisor state?  (the 970 UM is not crystal clear 
here).





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]