qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/4] target-s390x: Migrate to new nmi_monitor_han


From: Alexey Kardashevskiy
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/4] target-s390x: Migrate to new nmi_monitor_handler() CPU callback
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 00:25:59 +1000

This defines a nmi_monitor_handler() callback for s390 CPU class.

This removes #ifdef s390 branch in qmp_inject_nmi so new s390's
nmi_monitor_handler() callback is going to be used for NMI.

Since nmi_monitor_handler()-calling code is platform independent,
CPUState::cpu_index is used instead of S390CPU::env.cpu_num.
There should not be any change in behaviour as both @cpu_index and
@cpu_num are global CPU numbers.

Also, s390_cpu_restart() takes care of preforming operations in
the specific CPU thread so no extra measure is required here either.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
---
Changes:
v4:
* s/\<nmi\>/nmi_monitor_handler/

v3:
* now contains both old code removal and new code insertion, easier to
track changes

---
Is there any good reason to have @cpu_num in addition to @cpu_index?
Just asking :)
---
 cpus.c             | 14 --------------
 target-s390x/cpu.c |  6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
index c0b8918..53ae516 100644
--- a/cpus.c
+++ b/cpus.c
@@ -1480,20 +1480,6 @@ void qmp_inject_nmi(Error **errp)
             apic_deliver_nmi(cpu->apic_state);
         }
     }
-#elif defined(TARGET_S390X)
-    CPUState *cs;
-    S390CPU *cpu;
-
-    CPU_FOREACH(cs) {
-        cpu = S390_CPU(cs);
-        if (cpu->env.cpu_num == monitor_get_cpu_index()) {
-            if (s390_cpu_restart(S390_CPU(cs)) == -1) {
-                error_set(errp, QERR_UNSUPPORTED);
-                return;
-            }
-            break;
-        }
-    }
 #else
     CPUState *cs = qemu_get_cpu(monitor_get_cpu_index());
     CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cs);
diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu.c b/target-s390x/cpu.c
index c3082b7..267cfa4 100644
--- a/target-s390x/cpu.c
+++ b/target-s390x/cpu.c
@@ -160,6 +160,11 @@ static void s390_cpu_full_reset(CPUState *s)
     tlb_flush(s, 1);
 }
 
+static int s390_cpu_nmi_monitor_handler(CPUState *cs)
+{
+    return s390_cpu_restart(S390_CPU(cs));
+}
+
 #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
 static void s390_cpu_machine_reset_cb(void *opaque)
 {
@@ -245,6 +250,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
     scc->cpu_reset = s390_cpu_reset;
     scc->initial_cpu_reset = s390_cpu_initial_reset;
     cc->reset = s390_cpu_full_reset;
+    cc->nmi_monitor_handler = s390_cpu_nmi_monitor_handler;
     cc->has_work = s390_cpu_has_work;
     cc->do_interrupt = s390_cpu_do_interrupt;
     cc->dump_state = s390_cpu_dump_state;
-- 
2.0.0




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]