qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] extremely low IOPS performance of QCOW2 image format on


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] extremely low IOPS performance of QCOW2 image format on an SSD RAID1
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:22:37 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

Cc'ing more qcow2 experts.

On Mon, 06/23 11:14, lihuiba wrote:
> >Did you prefill the image? Amplification could come from cluster allocation.
> Yes! 
> I forgot to mention that I created the qcow2 image with 
> 'preallocation=metadata', and I have allocated
> the data blocks with dd in VM.
> 
> 
> Creating image in host:
> qemu-img create -f qcow2 -preallocation=metadata test.qcow2 100G
> 
> 
> Allocating the blocks in VM:
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/vdb bs=1M
> where vdb is the target image.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> At 2014-06-23 11:01:20, "Fam Zheng" <address@hidden> wrote:
> >On Mon, 06/23 10:06, lihuiba wrote:
> >> Hi, all
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I'm using a qcow2 image stored on a SSD RAID1 (2 x intel S3500), and I'm 
> >> benchmarking the
> >> system using fio. Although the throughput in VM (with KVM and virtio 
> >> enabled) is acceptable (67%
> >> of thoughtput in host), the IOPS performance seems is extremely low ---- 
> >> only 2% of IOPS in host.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I was initially using qemu-1.1.2, and I also tried qemu-1.7.1 for 
> >> comparison. There was no significant
> >> difference.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> In contrast, raw image and LVM perform very well. They usually achieve 
> >> 90%+ of throughput and
> >> 60%+ of IOPS. So the problem must lie in the QCOW2 image format.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> And I observed that, when I perform 4KB IOPS benchmark in VM with a QCOW2 
> >> image, fio in VM reports
> >> it is reading 9.x MB/s, while iostat in host reports the SSD is being read 
> >> 150+ MB/s. So QEMU or QCOW2
> >> must have amplified the amount of read by nearly 16 times.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> So, how can I fix or tune the performance issue of qcow2?
> >
> >Did you prefill the image? Amplification could come from cluster allocation.
> >
> >Fam
> >
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Thanks!
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> PS:
> >> 1. qemu parameters:
> >> -enable-kvm -cpu qemu64 -rtc base=utc,clock=host,driftfix=none -usb 
> >> -device usb-tablet -nodefaults -nodefconfig -no-kvm-pit-reinjection 
> >> -global kvm-pit.lost_tick_policy=discard -machine pc,accel=kvm -vga std -k 
> >> en-us -smp 8 -m 4096 -boot order=cdn -vnc :1 -drive 
> >> file=$1,if=none,id=drive_0,cache=none,aio=native -device 
> >> virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive_0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x5 -drive 
> >> file=$2,if=none,id=drive_2,cache=none,aio=native -device 
> >> virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive_2,bus=pci.0,addr=0x7
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 2. fio parameters for IOPS:
> >> fio --filename=/dev/vdb --direct=1 --ioengine=libaio --iodepth 32 --thread 
> >> --numjobs=1 --rw=randread --bs=4k --size=100% --runtime=60s 
> >> --group_reporting --name=test
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 3. fio parameters for throughput:
> >> fio --filename=/dev/vdb--direct=1 --ioengine=psync --thread --numjobs=3 
> >> --rw=randread --bs=1024k --size=100% --runtime=60s --name=randread 
> >> --group_reporting -name=test
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]