qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] migration/dirtyrate: Add dirtyrate statistics serie


From: Zheng Chuan
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] migration/dirtyrate: Add dirtyrate statistics series functions
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 17:59:48 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0


On 2020/8/21 0:28, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Chuan Zheng (zhengchuan@huawei.com) wrote:
>> Add dirtyrate statistics to record/update dirtyrate info.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chuan Zheng <zhengchuan@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: YanYing Zhuang <ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  migration/dirtyrate.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  migration/dirtyrate.h | 10 ++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/migration/dirtyrate.c b/migration/dirtyrate.c
>> index bb0ebe9..8708090 100644
>> --- a/migration/dirtyrate.c
>> +++ b/migration/dirtyrate.c
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>>  #include "dirtyrate.h"
>>  
>>  CalculatingDirtyRateState CalculatingState = CAL_DIRTY_RATE_INIT;
>> +static struct DirtyRateStat dirty_stat;
>>  
>>  static int dirty_rate_set_state(int new_state)
>>  {
>> @@ -40,6 +41,35 @@ static int dirty_rate_set_state(int new_state)
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void reset_dirtyrate_stat(void)
>> +{
>> +    dirty_stat.total_dirty_samples = 0;
>> +    dirty_stat.total_sample_count = 0;
>> +    dirty_stat.total_block_mem_MB = 0;
>> +    dirty_stat.dirty_rate = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void update_dirtyrate_stat(struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info)
>> +{
>> +    dirty_stat.total_dirty_samples += info->sample_dirty_count;
>> +    dirty_stat.total_sample_count += info->sample_pages_count;
>> +    /* size of 4K pages in MB */
>> +    dirty_stat.total_block_mem_MB += info->ramblock_pages / 256;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void update_dirtyrate(uint64_t msec)
>> +{
>> +    uint64_t dirty_rate;
>> +    unsigned int total_dirty_samples = dirty_stat.total_dirty_samples;
>> +    unsigned int total_sample_count = dirty_stat.total_sample_count;
>> +    size_t total_block_mem_MB = dirty_stat.total_block_mem_MB;
>> +
>> +    dirty_rate = total_dirty_samples * total_block_mem_MB *
>> +                 1000 / (total_sample_count * msec);
>> +
>> +    dirty_stat.dirty_rate = dirty_rate;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void calculate_dirtyrate(struct DirtyRateConfig config)
>>  {
>>      /* todo */
>> diff --git a/migration/dirtyrate.h b/migration/dirtyrate.h
>> index 9650566..af57c80 100644
>> --- a/migration/dirtyrate.h
>> +++ b/migration/dirtyrate.h
>> @@ -57,6 +57,16 @@ struct RamblockDirtyInfo {
>>      uint8_t *hash_result; /* array of hash result for sampled pages */
>>  };
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * Store calculate statistics for each measure.
>> + */
>> +struct DirtyRateStat {
>> +    unsigned int total_dirty_samples; /* total dirty pages for this measure 
>> */
>> +    unsigned int total_sample_count; /* total sampled pages for this 
>> measure */
>> +    size_t total_block_mem_MB; /* size of sampled pages in MB */
>> +    int64_t dirty_rate; /* dirty rate for this measure */
> 
> As I said in the previous review, please comment 'dirty_rate' with it's
> units.
> 
Sorry, i missed that, will be fix in V4:)
> Dave
> 
>> +};
>> +
>>  void *get_dirtyrate_thread(void *arg);
>>  #endif
>>  
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1
>>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]